SKIP TO CONTENT

Learn more about the innovative work shortlisted for the HSJ Partnership Awards. See the blog post

DOCUMENTS

papers

The importance of continuity of care in the likelihood of future hospitalization: is site of care equivalent to a primary clinician?

Published: October 1, 1998
Category: Bibliography > Papers
Authors: Gill JM, Mainous AG
Countries: United States
Language: null
Types: Care Management
Settings: Hospital

Am J Public Health 88:1539-1541.

Department of Family Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the effect of continuity with clinicians and health care sites on likelihood of future hospitalization.

METHODS: Delaware Medicaid patient data were analyzed. Logistic regression models supplied adjusted effects of continuity on hospitalization.

RESULTS: Patients in the high clinician continuity group had lower odds of hospitalization than patients in the high site/low clinician continuity group (odds ratio [OR] = 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.66, 0.87). The latter group did not differ from the low site/low clinician continuity group (OR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.80, 1.08).

CONCLUSIONS: A location providing health care without clinician continuity may not be sufficient to ensure cost-effective care.

PMID: 9772859
PMCID: PMC1508474

Cost Burden Evaluation,Population Markers,United States,Adolescent,Adult,Child,Preschool,Delaware,Gender,Health Services Accessibility,Infant,Newborn,Logistic Models,Medicaid,Middle Aged

Please log in/register to access.

Log in/Register

LinkedIn Facebook Twitter

© The Johns Hopkins University, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, and Johns Hopkins Health System.
All rights reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Statement

Back to top