SKIP TO CONTENT

Learn more about the innovative work shortlisted for the HSJ Partnership Awards. See the blog post

DOCUMENTS

papers

Influence of compliance on the incidence of cardiovascular events and health costs when using single-pill fixed-dose combinations for the treatment of hypertension

Published: November 23, 2010
Category: Bibliography > Papers
Authors: Galera Llorca J, Munoz Orti G, Navarro-Artieda R, Sicras-Mainar A
Countries: Spain
Language: null
Types: Care Management
Settings: Hospital

Med Clin (Barc) 136:183-191.

Directorate of Planning, Badalona Serveis Assistencials SA, Badalona, Spain

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of cardiovascular events (CVE) and health care costs in relation to compliance, persistence and level of blood pressure control when comparing patients treated with single-pill combinations (SPC) or free combinations (FC) for the treatment of hypertension.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Observational, multicenter study that included patients > 30 years old, from six primary care teams and two hospitals, who started pharmacological treatment for hypertension during 2006. Two study groups were established: SPC (ACEIs/diuretics; ARBs/diuretics) and FC (ACEIs + DIU; ARB + DIU, separately). Main variables studied were sociodemographic data, comorbidity, Charlson-index, compliance, persistence and achievement of therapeutic goals (ESH-ESC criteria). The cumulative incidence of CVE and a total-cost model were determined (differentiating: health/direct; non-health/indirect). Patients were followed for two years. Statistical analysis included logistic regression, Cox proportional hazards model and analysis of covariance. Statistical signification: p < 0.05.

RESULTS: 1,605 patients were recruited, 1,112 (69.3%) receiving SPC and 493 (30.7%) receiving FC, p 0.001; mean age: 69.4 (12.2) years; women: 55.5%. FC treatments were associated with ischaemic heat disease (OR = 1.4; 95% CI: 1.1-2.0) and organ failure (OR = 1.5; 95% CI: 1.2-2.1), p 0.031. Patients on SPC showed better therapeutic compliance (77.6% vs 71.9%; p 0.001) and longer persistence of treatment (62.1% on-treatment at 24-months [9% CI: 56.3-67.9] vs 49.7 [95% CI: 38.5-60.9]; p 0.001). Optimal control of blood pressure was higher in SPC (48.9% [95% CI: 43.0-54.8] vs 46.7% [95% CI: 35.6-57.8]; p 0.00). Cumulative incidence of cerebrovascular accidents in FC was 4.6% vs 2.4% in SPC; p = 0.041. The total health cae costs were lower in SPC (1,650.7 € vs 1,674.8 €; p 0.001), including lower specialized care costs (316.1 € vs 382.9 €; p 0.001), fewer hospital admissions and less loss of labour productivity (4.5 € vs 88.4 €; p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS: Better compliance and persistence with antihypertensive fixed-dose combinations improves therapeutic control, leading to a significant reduction of cerebrovascular accidents and total health care costs.

Medication,Cost Burden Evaluation,Medical Conditions,Spain,Absenteeism,Adult,Aged,80 and over,Anthropometry,Antihypertensive Agents/administration & dosage,Antihypertensive Agents/classification,Cardiovascular Diseases/economics,Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology,Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control,Co-morbidity,Drug Combinations,Gender,Follow-Up Studies,Hospitalization/economics,Hospitals,Special/statistics & numerical data,Hospitals,Urban/statistics & numerical data,Hypertension/blood,Hypertension/complications,Hypertension/physiopathology,Incidence,Middle Aged,Primary Health Care,Risk Assessment,Socioeconomic Factors,Spain/epidemiology,Stroke/economics,Stroke/epidemiology,Stroke/etiology,Stoke/prevention & control,Tablets

Please log in/register to access.

Log in/Register

LinkedIn Facebook Twitter

© The Johns Hopkins University, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, and Johns Hopkins Health System.
All rights reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Statement

Back to top