DOCUMENTS

bibliography

Incidence, Treatment, and Implications of Kidney Stones During Pregnancy: A Matched Population-Based Cohort Study

Published: February 17, 2020
Category: Bibliography
Authors: Blayne Welk, Jade Dirk, Jamie Kroft, Justin Slater, Michael Ordon, Stephanie Dixon
Countries: Canada
Language: English
Types: Acute care intervention, Population Health
Settings: Hospital, Specialist

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the incidence of kidney stones in pregnancy, the risk of adverse birth outcomes, and treatment trends.

Methods

We performed a population-based matched cohort study using Ontario’s health care databases. All pregnancies in Ontario from 2004 to 2014 were identified. The study exposure was hospital admission, emergency room visit, or intervention for kidney stones during pregnancy. Each pregnancy with a stone was matched to up to six pregnancies without a stone based on age, region of residence, income quintile, year of cohort entry, prior births, and multibirths. The primary outcome was adverse birth outcome defined as preterm birth, low birth weight, or infant death. Secondary outcomes included premature rupture of membranes (PROM), pre-eclampsia, and cesarean section (C/S), as well as the type/frequency of intervention for stones in pregnancy. Logistic regression models, with generalized estimating equations, were used to assess any differences in study outcomes across groups.

Results

Of 1.39 million pregnancies identified, there were 2863 pregnancies with stones (0.2%), which were matched with 17,171 pregnancies without stones. Pregnancies with stones had an increased risk for adverse birth outcome compared with matched pregnancies without stones (odds ratio [OR] 1.62, confidence interval [95% CI] 1.43–1.82, p < 0.0001). Pregnancies with stones also had a greater risk for pre-eclampsia (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.02–1.99, p = 0.04) and C/S (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.27–1.51, p < 0.0001), but not PROM. Twenty-six percent of pregnant patients admitted for a stone had an intervention, most commonly a stent or ureteroscopy.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrated an increased risk of adverse birth outcomes in pregnancies with kidney stones. These results will be important for counseling pregnant patients with kidney stones and women of reproductive age who are at risk of developing stones.

adverse birth outcomes, ureteroscopy, kidney stones

Please log in/register to access.

Log in/Register

LinkedIn Facebook Twitter

© The Johns Hopkins University, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, and Johns Hopkins Health System.
All rights reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Statement

Back to top